Page 11 - Issue 14
P. 11

Germany and France, too, initially responded in a
               way that was similar to the United Kingdom,
               ignoring the crisis as long as they could, until they
               couldn’t anymore. As commentator Giuliano da
               Empoli put it, even China, which has an appalling
               human rights record, did not use “economism” as
               a yardstick for its fight against the virus as overtly
               as European nations did (at least initially and until
               it was almost too late).

               The choice that has been laid in front of
               contemporary societies is unprecedented. Which
               do we choose to risk sacrificing: the lives of the
               vulnerable or the economic survival of the young?
               While the moral questions raised by this dilemma
               are genuine and profound (how many lives is the
               economy worth?), it also points to the ways in
               which public health has been neglected and been
               relegated to a place of lower priority than the
               health of the economy.


               Trust as currency


               It is with no small irony that the world of finance,
               usually arrogant and so often unaccountable, was
               the first to collapse, showing that the continued
               and unfathomable circulation of money in the
               world relies on a resource we all took for granted:
               the health of citizens. Markets feed on trust as a
               currency to build the future, and trust, it turns out,
               rests on the assumption of health.


               Modern states have traditionally guaranteed
               citizens’ health: They built hospitals, trained
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16